>6. explanation of either of them (Cora or Regina) would be great.
but I'd be happy with just Henry Sr. (why he puts up with all the stuff, and stays with them - as two examples)
>7. >and deciding that her person is not worthy of respect because she has made a choice you disagree with aren't victims of Stockholm Syndrome generally put into therapy - whether they want it or not? (though given that the only therapist in Storybrooke is a conscious(sp), probably not very helpful)
it would likely be one thing if Belle had fallen in love with Mr. Gold. But Belle fell in love with Rumplestiltskin instead.
>and he decided to force her to obey him no, he decided to force her to forget both him and Rumplestiltskin. there's no "obey" there.
>11. maybe Belle didn't trust herself to say goodbye and leave? (fearing he would say something that would convince her to stay?)
no subject
Date: 2012-10-26 02:22 am (UTC)>6.
explanation of either of them (Cora or Regina) would be great.
but I'd be happy with just Henry Sr. (why he puts up with all the stuff, and stays with them - as two examples)
>7.
>and deciding that her person is not worthy of respect because she has made a choice you disagree with
aren't victims of Stockholm Syndrome generally put into therapy - whether they want it or not?
(though given that the only therapist in Storybrooke is a conscious(sp), probably not very helpful)
it would likely be one thing if Belle had fallen in love with Mr. Gold. But Belle fell in love with Rumplestiltskin instead.
>and he decided to force her to obey him
no, he decided to force her to forget both him and Rumplestiltskin. there's no "obey" there.
>11.
maybe Belle didn't trust herself to say goodbye and leave? (fearing he would say something that would convince her to stay?)